Re: 6 GCC regressions, 6 new, with your patch on 2002-01-29T19:24:37Z.

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>]

This is approved.  I will try and find some time to check
this in before the end of the week.

(unless someone wants to check it in for me ;-) please use
the From: convention to give Neil the credits).

Thanks for the patch.

Regards,
Fernando


Neil Booth wrote:
> 
> Geoff Keating wrote:-
> 
> > Hmmm.  Actually, the first test, bitfields.exp, produces the warnings;
> 
> Hi Geoff,
> 
> This patch should fix the warnings.  I'll turn my attention to the enum
> issue once I've got rth's Alpha issue sorted (I've got some ideas about
> that, but I'm just building a cross-compiler to try and reproduce the
> situation).
> 
> I think this patch makes the tests do what they were supposed to do
> previously, but without warnings.  I'd appreciate if you or someone
> with write access to GDB would apply it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil.
> 
>         * testsuite/gdb.base/bitfields.c: Correct assignments to
>         bitfields to avoid warnings.
> 
> Index: bitfields.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bitfields.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.2 bitfields.c
> --- bitfields.c 1999/06/28 16:02:40     1.1.1.2
> +++ bitfields.c 2002/01/30 20:10:35
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int main ()
>    break1 ();
>    flags.uc = 0;
> 
> -  flags.s1 = 1;
> +  flags.s1 = -1;
>    break1 ();
>    flags.s1 = 0;
> 
> @@ -131,10 +131,10 @@ int main ()
>    flags.u3 = 0;
>    flags.u9 = 0;
> 
> -  flags.s1 = 0x1;
> -  flags.s2 = 0x3;
> -  flags.s3 = 0x7;
> -  flags.s9 = 0x1FF;
> +  flags.s1 = -1;
> +  flags.s2 = -1;
> +  flags.s3 = -1;
> +  flags.s9 = -1;
>    flags.sc = 0xFF;
>    break2 ();
>    flags.s1 = 0;
> @@ -169,20 +169,20 @@ int main ()
>    break4 ();
> 
>    /* Maximally negative values */
> -  flags.s1 = 0x1;
> -  flags.s2 = 0x2;
> -  flags.s3 = 0x4;
> -  flags.s9 = 0x100;
> +  flags.s1 = -0x1;
> +  flags.s2 = -0x2;
> +  flags.s3 = -0x4;
> +  flags.s9 = -0x100;
>    /* Extract bitfield value so that bitfield.exp can check if the target
>       understands signed bitfields.  */
>    i = flags.s9;
>    break4 ();
> 
>    /* -1 */
> -  flags.s1 = 0x1;
> -  flags.s2 = 0x3;
> -  flags.s3 = 0x7;
> -  flags.s9 = 0x1FF;
> +  flags.s1 = -1;
> +  flags.s2 = -1;
> +  flags.s3 = -1;
> +  flags.s9 = -1;
>    break4 ();
> 
>    flags.s1 = 0;

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9