From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12214-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16432 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 19:46:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16400 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 19:46:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 19:46:06 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 482B83F0E; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:45:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C4C6FF4.7040108@cygnus.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:46:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] Srink the overlay diagram
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020121115741.16755L-100000@is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00659.txt.bz2

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> One of the things giving overfull hboxes is JimB's overlay diagram.  The 
>> attached patch srinks it a little.
>> 
>> ok?
> 
> 
> Yes, but:
> 
> 
>> ! To map an overlay, copy its code from the larger address space to the
>> ! instruction address space.  Since the overlays shown here all use the
>> ! same mapped address, only one may be mapped at a time.
>> @end group
>> @end example
> 
> 
> Why is this text inside the @example?  If that's because of the desire
> to have the text always follow the diagram, I don't see anything that
> would prevent us from using @need instead of @group.  Am I missing
> something?


I don't know.  I just work here :-)

I think the @group is needed around the actual diagram, I don't know 
about the accompanying text.


> In general, it's bad to have free text inside @example, since TeX
> doesn't fill such text.  So typesetting that is prone to unexpected
> problems whenever you change the output dimensions slightly (e.g.,
> with @smallbook etc.).  It's best to avoid that entirely.


What do you suggest? :-)

Andrew