From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18667 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 16:48:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18558 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 16:48:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 16:48:19 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E203F11; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:48:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4C4648.6090003@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: remote.exp: fail properly if wrapper status message isn't found References: <3C4B6A90.8090801@cygnus.com> <3C4C44AB.EE38D3F9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >> Should this be committed to the src/dejagnu source base (regardless of dejagnu)? >> >> Andrew >> > > > We'd normally do that _and_ send the patch to the dejagnu external > maintainer. Just FYI, Hans-Peter's original post went to both lists. Andrew