From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31232 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 00:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31200 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 00:19:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 00:19:38 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4263F0A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:19:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4B5E9A.8050405@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton , Fernando Nasser Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Multilib support in gdb.asm tests References: <3C3F05DE.8010007@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 Just FYI, I turned this into a bug report. I suspect the problem will be on-going. Andrew Hi Andrew, > > + # FIXME: Invoking the assembler directly is incorrect. > > Just FYI, this is wrong. These tests apply to targets that do not > have a C compiler so must be able to invoke the assembler directly. I thought that this might be the case. What then should be done for multi-libbed targets where the multilib options passed to the compiler are not the same as the multilib options (if any) that get passed on to the assembler ? BTW - was this an approval of my patch ? Cheers Nick