From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9467 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2002 21:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9434 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 21:28:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2002 21:28:53 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDF33F0A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:28:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4B3695.2030203@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:28:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb/top.c: bump copyright year in banner References: <200201201942.NAA32638@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00599.txt.bz2 > This change looks obvious from my point of view, but I'm asking for > approval because it implements part of the legal interface. > > This is for mainline only, not 5.1 branch. I don't know if there have > been any changes to the 5.1 branch in calendar year 2002 that require > bumping the year, so I'm leaving the branch alone. > > OK to apply? > > Michael C > > 2002-01-20 Michael Chastain > > * top.c (print_gdb_version): Bump copyright year to 2002. > Good catch. Branch as well as Eli committed a change. 2002-01-13 Eli Zaretskii * go32-nat.c (save_npx) [__DJGPP_MINOR__ < 3]: Remove extraneous white space which prevented compilation. Reported by DSK . My I-AM-NOT-A-LAWYER understanding is that the (C) gets bumped if there is a a release in that year with changes in that year. Andrew