Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: patch to robustify gnuv3_rtti_type
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C4B2C01.2070701@bothner.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020119192000.A1028@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Go look at gnuv3_rtti_type again.  It's misnamed; it does not use RTTI
> at all.  It only looks that the vtable exists and has a name demangled to
> 'vtable for <Class>'.

Yes.  With my current patches (gcc and gdb), I get when debugging Java
runtime (written in C++):

(gdb) whatis source
type = Class *
(gdb) p *source
can't find class named `java::lang::Class', as given by C++ RTTI

That is actually an improvement.  The problem at this point is
inconsistent handling of namespaces bwteeen g++ and gcj.  gcj
emits a class named 'java.lang.Class' (including the periods),
while g++ emits plain 'Class'.  So gdb does not realize these are
the same class.  And neither g++ or gcj emits proper namespace
information.  I think this is one of the biggest stumbling-blocks
to proper Java debugging.

What is the current status of support for namepace-handling in gdb?
If we fix gcj so it emits the same debug into as g++ (i.e.
'java.lang.Class' is emitted as plain 'Class'), can gdb "do the
right thing" based on the mangled names?  If not, can gdb handle
dwarf2 namespace information (which g++ currently supresses)?
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/


  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-20 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-19 12:40 Per Bothner
2002-01-19 15:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-19 16:15   ` Per Bothner
2002-01-19 16:19     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-20 12:43       ` Per Bothner [this message]
2002-01-20 12:54         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-20 16:00           ` Per Bothner
2002-01-20 14:24         ` Daniel Berlin
2002-01-19 17:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C4B2C01.2070701@bothner.com \
    --to=per@bothner.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox