From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1370 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2002 17:33:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1338 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 17:33:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2002 17:33:56 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8003F0A; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:33:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4AFF7A.2030801@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> > Andrew, I don't know whether I should bother checking in these changes >> > on the branch anymore, what with your intent to release v5.2 from the >> > trunk. Please advise. > >> >> The still need to go onto the 5.1 branch because these are fixing (C) >> problems and I'm going to have to spin another 5.1.something with those >> fixes included (sigh). > > > Okay, I committed to the branch as well. But please check whether making > a distribution from the branch works, including "make info", because > something strange happened with fdl.texi on the branch, probably because > CVS and myself don't get along very well ;-) FYI, I try to remember to do this but ... I'm adding a checklist it to the release process. The best way to check the doco on the 5.1 branch: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/5.1/onlinedocs/ it is updated once every 24hrs. Andrew