From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15653 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 16:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15573 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 16:31:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 16:31:15 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66773DAC; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:31:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C46FC52.10007@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 > > There's no reason to hate @multitable, IMHO, it's just that the GDB > manual abuses it: it tries to squeeze too much information into a > table, and the table items have too many @code markup in them, so TeX > cannot break the lines in a useful way. Unfortunately, I don't know > enough about the related subject matter (the remote protocol) to > rewrite that table. Things to do one day. The entire chapter needs to be re-structured (again). >> 4. I put in a FIXME at one spot I noticed where I think a word is >> missing. > > > Thanks, I will fix it. > > Andrew, I don't know whether I should bother checking in these changes > on the branch anymore, what with your intent to release v5.2 from the > trunk. Please advise. The still need to go onto the 5.1 branch because these are fixing (C) problems and I'm going to have to spin another 5.1.something with those fixes included (sigh). Andrew