From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1871 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2002 20:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1839 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 20:11:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 20:11:13 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.231.12]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA10808; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:11:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C448B94.A378648D@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:11:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New command "info proc" for Linux References: <200201102008.g0AK8p112983@reddwarf.cygnus.com> <20020111192556.A18131@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:08:51PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > What do you Linux guys think of this? It's modelled after the info > > proc command from procfs.c, but uses/exposes the /proc information > > available on Linux. Do you see any architecture/portability issues? > > Not offhand - I like it. Someday I hope to be able to get this from > gdbserver, too. I would have killed for it over the past week. Committed.