> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:10:05PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> --- 214,223 ----
>> /* I think the code which prints this will always print it along with
>> the string, so no need to be verbose.  */
>> return "?";
>> !   else if ((sig >= TARGET_SIGNAL_FIRST) && (sig <= TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST))
>> !     return signals[sig].name;
>> !   else
>> !     return signals[sig].name;
>> }
>> > /* Given a name, return its signal.  */
> 
> 
> That's probably not what you meant to commit, since both cases are the
> same.


Er, no. Lets try the attached.  Turns out that 
signals[TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN].name is NULL.

Andrew