From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19237 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2002 23:40:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19206 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2002 23:40:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2002 23:40:04 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3163CFC; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:40:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C40C94E.7060702@cygnus.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: i386 Linux: provide correct type for orig_eax register References: <20020111222448.A73EC5E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 > I think we should #define HAVE_SSE_REGS unconditionally in >> config/i386/tm-linux.h. Later, when things are properly multi-arched, >> we can decide whether we actually display thos registers based on the >> actual processor model. > > > Okay. I'll give that a try. I'm trying to decide if it will break something. The old ``remote packet is defined by the layout of the register buffer'' problem is lurking ready to strike :-( This would put the SSE registers into the register buffer causing GDB to try to send them to a target that, rightly, doesn't expect them (hmm and also doesn't support a register-write packet) It is why I was hacking on remote.c. I've two more things to do: the protocol format command and sort out what ever happend to a read-register packet proposal that was posted. Andrew