From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25917 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 17:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25881 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 17:50:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 17:50:47 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82383C53; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:50:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C3F25F7.6090007@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Multilib support in gdb.asm tests References: <3C3F05DE.8010007@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 > Hi Andrew, > > >> > + # FIXME: Invoking the assembler directly is incorrect. > >> > Just FYI, this is wrong. These tests apply to targets that do not >> have a C compiler so must be able to invoke the assembler directly. > > > I thought that this might be the case. > > What then should be done for multi-libbed targets where the multilib > options passed to the compiler are not the same as the multilib > options (if any) that get passed on to the assembler ? For the moment, probably something like you propose. > BTW - was this an approval of my patch ? No. I'll leave that to the testsuite maintainer. Andrew