From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22718 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2002 17:36:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22676 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 17:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 17:36:12 -0000 Received: from telocity.telocity.com (taarna.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.102]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA04371; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:36:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C3DD003.52C8@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:36:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jason@redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH to testsuite/gdb.c++/namespace.exp References: <200201101650.KAA15264@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > gdb built from the 5.1 branch prints '\000'. It looks like one of those > endless cosmetic changes where the testsuite did not keep up with some > change in gdb. > > I'm happy with the patch, except that you need to add "2002" to the list > of copyright years in line 1 of gdb.c++/namespace.exp. Thanks. Would it not be better, then, if the test accepted both \0 and \000?