Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Crasher bug in infptrace.c
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 22:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C33F983.4030605@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200112310020.fBV0Kr119534@reddwarf.cygnus.com>

> Here's one for the books...
> 
> Child_xfer_memory (one of the oldest functions in gdb)  uses alloca 
> to allocate a buffer that can be arbitrarily large (as large as the
> size of a memory read/write).  Alloca is known to be unsafe for large
> enough chunks of memory, because it puts them on the stack -- and 
> sure enough, it turns out that you can crash GDB by reading a large
> enough data object from target memory.  For Linux, "large enough"
> appears to be about 8 megabytes.  But this code has been as it is
> for over ten years, and I've never heard of a problem with it before.


BTW, the gdbint.texinfo document suggests that anything more than a few 
k is dangerous.

http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC103


> Test case attached (although because it causes GDB to core dump, 
> it results in an ERROR instead of a FAIL...)
> 
> I don't believe this buffer is actually needed at all, but I've
> gone with the minimum change instead of rewriting the function
> so that it doesn't use a local buffer.
> 
> By the way, this code has been cloned in rs6000-nat.c, symm-nat.c, 
> infttrace.c, and x86-64-linux-nat.c, so they probably have the
> same bug.  I haven't touched them because I can't easily test them.


Probably a good move, perhaps add a FIXME comment to them so that the 
person that does encounter the bug knows they are not seeing things :-)

> +   int alloc = count * sizeof (PTRACE_XFER_TYPE);
> +   PTRACE_XFER_TYPE *buffer;
> + 
>     /* Allocate buffer of that many longwords.  */
> !   if (len < GDB_MAX_ALLOCA)
> !     {
> !       buffer = (PTRACE_XFER_TYPE *) alloca (alloc);
> !     }
> !   else
> !     {
> !       buffer = (PTRACE_XFER_TYPE *) xmalloc (alloc);
> !       make_cleanup (xfree, buffer);
> !     }


I think it would be better to just abandon the alloca() case and just 
use xmalloc().  That way the same code path (xmalloc()) is always used 
and mysterious / obscure bugs that end up being attributed to 
len?=GDB_MAX_ALLOCA can be avoided.


Andrew




  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-01-03  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-30 16:25 Michael Snyder
2001-12-30 22:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-31 12:03   ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-31 12:05     ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-31 22:05       ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-31 21:59     ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-02 22:26 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-01-03 11:27   ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-03 11:58     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-03 12:15       ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-13 17:48         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 18:41           ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-13 19:27             ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C33F983.4030605@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox