From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21654 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2001 18:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21633 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 18:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (195.224.55.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 18:49:47 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137A33C84; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:49:45 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3C20E148.4090201@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011207 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: law@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: infttrace vs add_thread References: <21994.1008787094@porcupine.cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 > When add_thread was changed to accept a ptid_t type instead of just an > integer, nobody updated infttrace.c to reflect those changes. > > The net result is a segfault if you try to use GDB on hpux11. > > Again, since I'm no longer a GDB maintainer, I'll hold off installing the > fix until approved by a GDB maintainer. But you do have write after approval. Cleanups like this are considered obvious. Andrew