Re: [RFA] New tests for 'const' and 'volatile' expressions

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>]

Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> > Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a test that I forgot to submit back in September,
> > > > after submitting the changes to the expression parser that
> > > > permitted more complex expressions involving const and volatile.
> > >
> > > Nice, new tests are good!
> > >
> > > > I've tested the test on several native and embedded targets.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do they pass?
> >
> > Oh, yes -- no failures, when tested on the main branch.
> > I have not tested the 5.1 branch.  If it fails, there would
> > be two choices:
> >
> >   * merge the parser patch onto the branch
> >   * omit this test from the branch.
> > >
> 
> As this is a new feature, it would not make much sense have it
> where the feature was not yet added, right?
> 
> So I would say it goes where you previous patch goes, and only there.
> 
> I guess you can check it in to the trunk now.

Committed.