From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:48:00 -0000 Message-id: <3C07B871.7020704@cygnus.com> References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org> <20011130014034.A29999@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00615.html > Jim, can I commit these? It'll make it easier for me to post the > following batch. Now that GCC emits the information I need (on HEAD at > least) I'd like to finish this up. > > I guess that I can commit the gnu-v3-abi bits on my own initiative, > since no one objected... actually, I guess the values stuff is > unmaintained too? I wouldn't describe it as un-maintained. It is fundamental core code, JimB and I would both be keeping a very keen eye on it. > MAINTAINERS says: > If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility > falls to the head maintainer. > So I guess I need approval from one of Ye Divine Entities first. Yes. > [Would someone more familiar with the state of affairs than I > explicitly list the unmaintained parts in MAINTAINERS? Quite a few > things seem to have slipped down that path.] Nothing is is really unmaintained. The buck (unfortunatly :-) stops here. Did you have any comments on my recent proposal to change how targets (and natives) can get a change approved? Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12517 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2001 16:48:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12494 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2001 16:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2001 16:48:53 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AB73DF1; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:48:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C07B871.7020704@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011127020634.A10010@nevyn.them.org> <20011130014034.A29999@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011121173000.pRJ2eSvf1XnOCehRCKLiHKGRZoVx2ET6PUqPZALR5F4@z> > Jim, can I commit these? It'll make it easier for me to post the > following batch. Now that GCC emits the information I need (on HEAD at > least) I'd like to finish this up. > > I guess that I can commit the gnu-v3-abi bits on my own initiative, > since no one objected... actually, I guess the values stuff is > unmaintained too? I wouldn't describe it as un-maintained. It is fundamental core code, JimB and I would both be keeping a very keen eye on it. > MAINTAINERS says: > If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility > falls to the head maintainer. > So I guess I need approval from one of Ye Divine Entities first. Yes. > [Would someone more familiar with the state of affairs than I > explicitly list the unmaintained parts in MAINTAINERS? Quite a few > things seem to have slipped down that path.] Nothing is is really unmaintained. The buck (unfortunatly :-) stops here. Did you have any comments on my recent proposal to change how targets (and natives) can get a change approved? Andrew