From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1093 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 04:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1009 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 04:46:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 04:46:58 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366053DBA; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:46:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:54:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target. References: <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Pierre Muller wrote: >>> >>> > >>>>-#undef HAVE_SSE_REGS /* FIXME! win32-nat.c needs to support XMMi >>>>registers */ >>>>+/* Use SSE registers if winnt.h contains information about them. */ >>>>+#ifdef HAVE_CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS >>>>+#define HAVE_SSE_REGS >>>>+#else > So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then? It seems pretty > straight-forward except for this issue. The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it. enjoy, Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target. Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3C031AC2.6090009@cygnus.com> References: <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00479.html Message-ID: <20011126204700.ZD9dF0lnt517shzMz_u93MYasA4elE4zHGMLnDNnQK4@z> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Pierre Muller wrote: >>> >>> > >>>>-#undef HAVE_SSE_REGS /* FIXME! win32-nat.c needs to support XMMi >>>>registers */ >>>>+/* Use SSE registers if winnt.h contains information about them. */ >>>>+#ifdef HAVE_CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS >>>>+#define HAVE_SSE_REGS >>>>+#else > So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then? It seems pretty > straight-forward except for this issue. The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it. enjoy, Andrew