From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22558 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 20:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22465 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 20:54:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 20:54:17 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281163CF6; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:54:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3BF42B78.4090607@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Holcomb Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 >> Is there a reason for pulling in GCC's hacks rather than going to the >> official version per src/MAINTAINERS: >> >> ltconfig; ltmain.sh >> libtool: http://gnu.org >> Changes need to be done in tandem with the official LIBTOOL >> sources or submitted to the master file maintainer and brought >> in via a merge. > > > It was my impression from Alexandre that he had already imported these > changes from the official sources into gcc's tree. For some reason, they > weren't imported into the binutils/gdb tree at that time. Ok, so now that the change is committed to the master repository, it can be committed locally. Can the ``gcc-local'' bit be clarified - it is no longer gcc-local. Rather it was an accelerated patch brought in from the master repository. Andrew