From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-10575-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24341 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 02:20:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24316 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 02:20:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 02:20:41 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (taarna.cygnus.com [205.180.230.102])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA27363;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3BF326B0.B4030626@cygnus.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:37:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Organization: Red Hat
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Update D10V target to use new Harvardized type casts.
References: <200111142057.fAEKvKB12616@reddwarf.cygnus.com> <3BF2E045.5060906@cygnus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > This one-line change lets the D10V back-end recognize the new
> > Harvardized type casts eg. "(@code int *)", so that a pointer
> > can be forced into the address space of choice.
> >
> > The exact same change can be used for (most) other Harvard back-ends.
> 
> (I quit as d10v maintainer :-)
> 
> Yes, looks ok.

Committed.

> One thought, though, should that test:
> 
>         ... == FUNC || ... == METHOD || ... == CODE_SPACE
> 
> be abstracted out?  Every harvard target I've looked at has had that
> same test.

Possible.  Although it's only a few lines, so far they  have shaken out
as pretty generically useful.  Can't think where they would go though...