From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-10563-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12682 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2001 20:24:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12660 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 20:24:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 20:24:44 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (taarna.cygnus.com [205.180.230.102])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA24385;
	Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3BF2D343.B33A72A6@cygnus.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:34:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Organization: Red Hat
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
CC: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
References: <3BB4D843.A92818B9@cygnus.com> <3BB512A9.6050801@cygnus.com>	<3BB5195F.6050603@cygnus.com> <npu1xhq0d9.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3BBA2DC9.5060500@cygnus.com> <3BBA3B03.B864ABE0@cygnus.com> <3BBA54AE.3080104@cygnus.com> <3BBCB371.27C6@redhat.com> <3BBCC2D9.9000706@cygnus.com> <3BC1E3C2.C2E38EFF@cygnus.com> <3BC405E5.4090607@cygnus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > OK -- so where do we stand?  Are you OK with this patch going in?
> > To be refined later as necessary?
> 
> I'm ok with the current set of changes (need to contact David Taylor
> though).  The debate is about the semantics of a type cast and that
> depends on this change being present.
> 
> While this is happening, can I suggest cleaning things up a little -
> stray +/- blank lines, coding standard and some missing ChangeLog
> entries (TYPE_AS_TYPE?).

After some delay, I'm ready to resubmit this, with clean-ups.
Since it's been so long (and this thread is so long too), I'll
start a new thread.