From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@science.uva.nl>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 09:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BD2F499.8070201@cygnus.com>
References: <20011011161453.A15989@nevyn.them.org> <3BCD045B.4050607@cygnus.com> <20011017002357.A25378@nevyn.them.org> <3BCDDD47.2010805@cygnus.com> <s3iofn1w94e.fsf@soliton.wins.uva.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00286.html

> 
> It just occured to me that if we really want to use a consistent
> naming scheme, we should probably use CPU-OS-low.c
> (i.e. i386-linux-low.c) just like we have CPU-OS-tdep.c and
> CPU-OS-nat.c.

Yes, obvious? :-)