From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/{,,}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:59:00 -0000 Message-id: <3BCF2661.3020304@cygnus.com> References: <3BCEFBF4.3000508@cygnus.com> <7999-Thu18Oct2001202904+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00256.html >> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:57:40 -0400 >> From: Andrew Cagney > >> > > >> >> or if it did it couldn't use any of these low-* files right? > >> > >> > >> > Sorry, I don't understand this. How is the DJGPP port different from >> > any other port in this respect? > >> >> I don't think DJGPP's low/nat interface looks like UNIX's ptrace() or >> /procfs so much of the existing low-* code wouldn't be used. > > > That's true, but the low-* files are supposed to be compiled on the > target system, not on the host, right? If so, all but one of these > low-* files is irrelevant for other platforms as well, right? Yes. My understanding of DanielJ's cleanup is that it better structures (separate os/cpu specific and generic files) the unix low code. Andrew