From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] Swap out current when creating a new architecture
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 01:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BCBF6E3.73B404@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BCB902A.8090003@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> Really nice bug!
>
> The proposed change unfortunatly isn't right for reasons similar to the
> original current_gdbarch problem. The exec file might belong to a
> completely different architecture. Consider a sequence like:
>
> (gdb) file hello.d10v
> (gdb) info architecture
> The current architecture is d10v
> (gdb) set cris-mode CRIS_MODE_USER
Hm, I had a feeling I was just moving the problem elsewhere, though I
didn't think of the case of having gdb configured for two
architectures. But with multi-arch I guess this is not just a remote
possibility.
> For MIPS, the problem has so far been avoided by coding functions as:
>
> if (set by user)
> return user value;
> else
> return value from architecture;
>
From looking at the MIPS target just now I thought it would suffer from
the same problem when it comes to guessing the ABI (since info.abfd is
used if present). But then I saw that the functions tied to the MIPS
specific user-commands don't call gdbarch_update, they change
current_gdbarch directly. I'm going to try something similar.
Thanks,
Orjan
--
Orjan Friberg E-mail: orjan.friberg@axis.com
Axis Communications AB Phone: +46 46 272 17 68
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-16 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3BB16441.30805@cygnus.com>
2001-09-26 22:56 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-26 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-30 12:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-01 4:34 ` Orjan Friberg
2001-10-14 17:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-15 18:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-16 1:59 ` Orjan Friberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BCBF6E3.73B404@axis.com \
--to=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox