From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:25:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BC405E5.4090607@cygnus.com>
References: <3BB4D843.A92818B9@cygnus.com> <3BB512A9.6050801@cygnus.com> <3BB5195F.6050603@cygnus.com> <npu1xhq0d9.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3BBA2DC9.5060500@cygnus.com> <3BBA3B03.B864ABE0@cygnus.com> <3BBA54AE.3080104@cygnus.com> <3BBCB371.27C6@redhat.com> <3BBCC2D9.9000706@cygnus.com> <3BC1E3C2.C2E38EFF@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00109.html

> Thanks!
> 
> 
> OK -- so where do we stand?  Are you OK with this patch going in?
> To be refined later as necessary?

I'm ok with the current set of changes (need to contact David Taylor 
though).  The debate is about the semantics of a type cast and that 
depends on this change being present.

While this is happening, can I suggest cleaning things up a little - 
stray +/- blank lines, coding standard and some missing ChangeLog 
entries (TYPE_AS_TYPE?).

Andrew