From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:16:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BBCC396.3020906@cygnus.com>
References: <3BB4D843.A92818B9@cygnus.com> <3BB512A9.6050801@cygnus.com> <3BB5195F.6050603@cygnus.com> <3BBB50C0.BD01BF20@cygnus.com> <3BBB5391.4010001@cygnus.com> <npk7yco1ay.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3BBB86B6.8090809@cygnus.com> <npsnd0mhwp.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00086.html

>  Have a look at the way GDB vs GCC implements ``func + 4'' for AIX.  We 
>> do this now.
> 
> 
> And indeed, that discrepancy is undesirable, right?  We should not
> introduce more.

The above discrepency is very desireable, the last thing we want to do 
is fix GDB making it behave like GCC.

Andrew