Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb extension for Harvard architectures

Andrew Cagney
2001-10-10T01:25:00Z

> Thanks!
>
>
> OK -- so where do we stand? Are you OK with this patch going in?
> To be refined later as necessary?

I'm ok with the current set of changes (need to contact David Taylor
though). The debate is about the semantics of a type cast and that
depends on this change being present.

While this is happening, can I suggest cleaning things up a little -
stray +/- blank lines, coding standard and some missing ChangeLog
entries (TYPE_AS_TYPE?).

Andrew