From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Don Howard <dhoward@redhat.com>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] deleting breakpoints inside of 'commands' [Repost]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:09:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BB25212.4050807@cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109211638230.1755-100000@theotherone> <1010925001014.ZM30380@ocotillo.lan> <3BAFE360.9080904@cygnus.com> <3BB2340C.CB386069@cygnus.com> <1010926211948.ZM2311@ocotillo.lan> <3BB24E4A.D31D4196@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00371.html

> Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 26,  4:01pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>> 
> 
>> > And I don't think Don's latest patch is complex, or considerably more
>> > complex than the simplistic copy approach (or hack!).  It is elegant
>> > (although Kevin's comments are valid and should be incorporated).
>> >
>> > If Don can add a cleanup function and do the polishing suggested by Kevin
>> > on his last patch I suggest that we stick with that one.
> 
>> 
>> Here are my preferences...
>> 
>> I like the patch that makes a copy the best since the changes are easy
>> to understand and localized to one function.

As noted before it is mine as well.

Andrew