From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add "long long" tests to whatis.exp
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BAB83C9.F6D224E4@cygnus.com>
References: <3BAA615D.9E0A310D@cygnus.com> <7458-Fri21Sep2001101238+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00289.html

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:36:29 -0700
> > From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
> >
> > 2001-09-20  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>
> >
> >       * gdb.base/whatis.exp: Add tests for long long.
> 
> Are we sure all supported compilers have long long?  If not, these
> tests will fail to compile when the test suite is run.

There are at least three other test files in gdb.base that
unconditionally declare a long long:

  long_long.c
  varargs.c
  return2.c

I haven't heard anything about them failing to compile
in some environments, but if they do, then we need a
general mechanism for dealing with the problem.

Michael