From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>,
Don Howard <dhoward@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] deleting breakpoints inside of 'commands' [Repost]
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA7608F.3040104@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BA7519F.70E25EC3@redhat.com>
>> Is it worth the effort? Is this duplication costly
>> compared to everything else already being done by
>> bpstat_do_actions? Or am I worrying over nothing?
I think this is in the noise. GDB has performance problems with very
large symbol files, it doesn't have problems with 3 line breakpoint scripts.
> I share your concerns. And I see no reason why this should be allowed
> --
> the script can always "disable" its own breakpoint with the same effect
> for all practical purposes.
>
> A patch adding a "cannot delete self" error message would be nice.
I would really rather not see GDB introduce, undocumented, edge
conditions like this. I think the patch Don submitted had the very nice
effect of eliminating the need for such a special case.
2c
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-17 9:34 Don Howard
2001-09-17 15:39 ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-18 6:56 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-18 7:56 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-09-18 8:09 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-18 10:34 ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-18 17:47 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-18 18:03 ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-19 7:20 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-19 8:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-19 9:22 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-19 11:44 ` PRMS not TODO: " Andrew Cagney
2001-09-19 9:33 ` Don Howard
2001-09-19 12:08 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-19 12:18 ` Michael Snyder
2001-09-19 13:09 ` Kevin Buettner
[not found] ` <3BA905AD.5F8F1A68@redhat.com>
2001-09-19 14:22 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-19 14:44 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-20 15:24 ` Don Howard
2001-09-20 18:05 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109211638230.1755-100000@theotherone>
2001-09-24 17:10 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-24 17:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-24 18:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-26 13:07 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-26 14:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-09-26 14:57 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-26 15:09 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BA7608F.3040104@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=dhoward@redhat.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox