From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Denis Joseph Barrow <DJBARROW@de.ibm.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: New gdb 31 & 64 bit patches for S/390
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 21:45:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B96FF5D.3020504@cygnus.com>
References: <OFEFF0AD94.761C34C1-ONC1256AB6.005503EE@de.ibm.com> <20010828163239.A18011@false.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00063.html

> 
> For now, the thing to do seems to be duplicating it in low-linux.c. 

yes. the current consensus is that gdb/gdbserver should be kept as thin 
and independant of gdb as possible.  this means duplicating a few 
consants in low-linux.c.

andrew