From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: completion.exp: what is "a64l"?
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 15:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B69DA69.26D71193@cygnus.com>
References: <3B68927F.64EE5475@cygnus.com> <877kwn1glg.fsf@cgsoftware.com> <3B68AAE4.70805@cygnus.com> <3B69A211.B20C1E73@cygnus.com> <15209.44021.611482.48798@krustylu.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00060.html

Elena Zannoni wrote:
> 
> Michael Snyder writes:
>  > Andrew Cagney wrote:
>  > >
>  > > ``a64l, l64a, l64a_r - convert between a long integer and a base-64
>  > > ASCII string''
>  >
>  > Is there any reason why a GDB test for completion
>  > should require the presence of this symbol?
> 
> No, read further in the thread.
> 
> You can even change the completion test. Pick another letter that is
> not 'a' and that makes more sense for the file we are debugging.

Why don't I just take the literal "a64l" out of the expect target?