From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: SETPGRP and autoconf
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:51:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B66D3F3.8010001@cygnus.com>
References: <20010725162420.A13860@nevyn.them.org> <200107261040.f6QAe2T05377@delius.kettenis.local> <20010726084450.A2941@nevyn.them.org> <3B60505D.5080304@cygnus.com> <20010727102017.A5627@nevyn.them.org> <3B61CFB7.9080302@cygnus.com> <20010730150903.A32225@nevyn.them.org> <3B65E437.9020502@cygnus.com> <20010730155239.A3711@nevyn.them.org> <3B65E690.7060104@cygnus.com> <20010730155939.A4241@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00756.html

> Didn't previous e-mail conclude that for such a case setpgid() would be 
>> used so there wasn't a problem?
> 
> 
> The results of the test are not important, but configure will fail to
> run at present.


Ah!  In that case ... (yes, why not).

	Andrew