From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Kevin Buettner , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Pb when calling a nested function in the inferior Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:41:00 -0000 Message-id: <3B65E28E.3040308@cygnus.com> References: <20010730144818.A4726@act-europe.fr> <3B659961.26242FE@cygnus.com> <1010730183050.ZM5116@ocotillo.lan> <20010730232457.A8362@act-europe.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00731.html >> > I've personally never used (or even seen) this >> > nested function syntax, so I don't know anything >> > useful about it. -- Michael > > > Yes, I hesitated a bit before posting this example, knowing that it was > a gcc extension. However, I thought it would make an easier to undertand > example rather than posting Ada95 code. Just an aside, that is definitly a good move. People are far more likely to have GCC than Ada installed :-) Using this strategy should also lead to a more robust test case (does this mean we're going to end up with testsuite/gdb.ada and testsuite/gdb.gcc :-) Regarding your question, I don't know. Perhaphs there is something in the debug info? Andrew