From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] libgdb updates to doco
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:43:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B606479.2070205@cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010726095158.28739G-100000@is>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00661.html

>> Eli, in your original comments you mentioned more @node's.  I'm not sure 
>> that I follow - gdbint is very @node sparse only having them for @chapters.
> 
> 
> That is IMHO a mistake, and we should gradually correct it.  The


Yes true.

> Texinfo cross-references (and thus index entries) refer to the
> enclosing node in the Info version, so having smaller nodes makes sure
> you will land close to the stuff you are looking for.  (There's the
> new @anchor directive which is free from this limitation, but older
> Info readers don't support it, so we should not yet use it too much;
> and index entries don't produce @anchor's anyway.)


For my part, I was looking for an existing example but couldn't find one 
:-(.

I've checked in the libgdb stuff.  Hmm, whats next?

	Andrew