From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Testsuite addition for x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM fix
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B604DD6.9080708@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B603B33.B9B33633@redhat.com>
>
> All are the same. "step" gets into foo(), a "finish" finishes foo(),
> but then there is bar() so you stop there next. Another "finish" and
> you will stop on the line that follows the above lines.
>
> Note that a "finishi" command would leave you at the return point at
> some PC in the middle of the above source lines.
So what happens if you're sitting in foo() and type finish but the
previous command wasn't step. Do you still find yourself in bar()?
>
> 'step' should never leave you in the same line from where you've issued
> it. That is counter intuitive, even if you had a stop-finish in the
> middle.
This actually throws me. Reading it one way it suggests that ``step ;
finish'' should have special behavour. See question above.
Anyway try thinking of ``finish'' as a special form of step. What
happens if you step through foo()? When foo() exits do you jump to
bar() or go back to the caller?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-26 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200005192321.e4JNLEv13368@delius.kettenis.local>
2001-06-27 22:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-06-28 10:54 ` Michael Snyder
2001-07-09 14:21 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-09 14:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <3B4A2C7C.85C688C4@cygnus.com>
2001-07-09 15:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-09 15:28 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-25 16:11 ` Michael Snyder
2001-07-25 16:45 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-25 18:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-26 7:14 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-07-26 7:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-07-26 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-07-26 8:48 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 8:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-07-26 10:21 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 10:38 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 10:06 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2001-07-26 10:24 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 10:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-07-26 10:54 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 6:10 ` Michael Snyder
2001-07-26 7:14 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-07-26 7:45 ` Michael Snyder
2001-07-26 7:51 ` Fernando Nasser
[not found] <200106281927.MAA29407@stanley.cygnus.com>
2001-06-28 12:41 ` Stan Shebs
2001-06-28 13:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B604DD6.9080708@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox