From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>, gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Testsuite addition for x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM fix
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 06:10:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B601672.25B7@redhat.com>
References: <200005192321.e4JNLEv13368@delius.kettenis.local> <3B3ABD6E.1040304@cygnus.com> <3B4A2056.4D58E307@cygnus.com> <20010709143406.A17003@nevyn.them.org> <3B4A2C7C.85C688C4@cygnus.com> <3B5F5218.5D55130E@cygnus.com> <3B5F595F.821DA2A5@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00643.html

Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> > I must disagree.  Often, when you reach this line and you
> > want to step into foo, you will not notice the call to bar
> > until it is too late and you have stepped into bar.
> >
> > When that happens, the only way to reach foo is to "finish" from
> > bar, and then step again.
> >
> 
> As I have explained in this thread (one month ago), the single stepping
> caused by finish would stop as soon as foo is entered -- exactly the
> behavior you want.

But that's not the behavior I want.  "Finish"
should take me to the function that called bar.
Foo did not call bar.