From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:42:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B58C1E3.5040706@cygnus.com>
References: <20010719120143.A19963@nevyn.them.org> <3B574A5D.6030403@cygnus.com> <20010719141742.A25968@nevyn.them.org> <3B5755C9.8070003@cygnus.com> <20010719145237.A28070@nevyn.them.org> <9003-Fri20Jul2001103107+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010720083249.A21309@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00534.html

> 
> Well, the way I see it is that the signal numbering convention is part
> of the remote protocol, and so should be documented in the manual; at
> the same time I didn't really want to duplicate the hundred and
> something signals inline in the texinfo documentation.


> I don't really understand why the remote protocol is documented in the
> user's manual, either :)


The user guide documents public interfaces and the protocol is a public 
interface.  Check the e-mail archives for more detailed rationale.

	Andrew