From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Nick Duffek <nsd@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Possible remote.c patch for Z-packet breakpoints + Harvard + SID
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:04:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B547E19.2070201@cygnus.com>
References: <o5pub0sqqy.fsf@toenail.toronto.redhat.com> <200107162228.f6GMSNx20471@rtl.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00426.html

Nick,

Have you looked at ``TRANSLATE_XFER_ADDRESS''?  The d10v uses it to 
translate between a virtual CORE_ADDR and a real CORE_ADDR.

However, as a general rule, I think GDB should be consistent and always 
send down down CORE_ADDR's.  Remember the target needs to know about 
CORE_ADDRs anyway.  They are exactly the same as what BFD uses for 
bfd_vma's when specifying things like section addresses.

	Andrew