From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:53:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B537069.1000304@cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010711161311.5321C-100000@is> <3B4E41B5.64FB@redhat.com> <3028-Sat14Jul2001140821+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <np1yngzgke.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00401.html

>> 2001-07-14  Eli Zaretskii  <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
>> 
>> The following changes avoid polluting global namespace with the
>> `enable' and `disable' identifiers, because some platforms define
>> in their system headers symbols with global scope that go by those
>> names.
>> 
> 
> 
> Why are the following changes necessary?  Structure members aren't in
> the global namespace:


See earlier e-mail from me.   The existing code read:

	b->enable = enabled
and 
b->enable == disabled

ulgh.

	Andrew