Re: [rfa] MIPS/Linux, take 3

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

Daniel, see attached.  One big glitch, copyright, sigh.

	Andrew
From fnasser@cygnus.com Mon Jul 09 13:25:00 2001
From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] ending-run.exp
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 13:25:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B4A132E.AA2DE377@cygnus.com>
References: <3B40EB11.A026F84D@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00205.html
Content-length: 995

Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
> This script seems to expect that, if you step past the return from main,
> you will end up in some sort of "start" function.
> 
> Can anyone think of any reason why "Program exited normally" is not
> a legitimate output to see after stepping past the return from main?
> 

Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation.

Well, main() is normally called from inside crt0  from some sort of "start" function.  When you step past the return from main you should return to the frame above main, i.e., to after the call to main inside the "start" function in crt0.

If it is not stopping there it is either a bug or some new situation that did not use to exist.

I don't think we should accept "Program exited normally" until we understand a little bit more of what is actually happening when we get this message.

Regards,
Fernando

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9