From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: fix GDB casts when pointers are not addresses
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:12:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B4556A5.3040702@cygnus.com>
References: <20010628225704.9AB635E9CB@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3B43F7F6.3080902@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00144.html

> - the integer produced is the byte address in the code segment (so for
>   the D10V, this would be the pointer's value times four), or
> 
> - the integer produced is the 16-bit pointer value reinterpreted as a
>   16-bit integer --- no adjustment takes place.
> 
> Currently, GDB implements the former, while GCC implements the former.
> This patch changes GDB to match GCC.
> 
> 
> Um, ....

Jim,  I take it you ment:

GDB implements the former, while GCC implements the latter.

	Andrew