Re: [RFA] mips32_next_pc overdue cleanup

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

Eli wrote:

> According to the masks in the opcodes
>> directory, these changes are rigt, and what we had before can't possibly
>> work.  Especially the fact that we would never, ever predict a BNE as taken
>> before these changes convinced me that they really were correct and this
>> code had never been particularly tested.  Comments?
> 
> 
> I'd appreciate a short test case for this.  I'd like to verify that
> the previous stuff indeed didn't work and that the new stuff does.
> 
> Assuming that this code is run on SGI Irix, that is.


I'm wondering the same thing.

> I'll try to make one.  I'm not immediately sure how.
> 
> It looks almost as if this code was for an unreleased port inside
> Cygnus - anyone know if that's true?  I see active work on it in 1998
> and 2000 in the ChangeLogs, and no mention of removing calls to it
> - but nothing uses it at all.


I'll do some digging.

One thing, it is very easy for a software single step function to be 
implemented yet never tested - everything supports h/w singlestep 
now-a-days.

	Andrew