From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: "Peter.Schauer" <Peter.Schauer@Regent.E-Technik.TU-Muenchen.DE>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] if (INNER_THAN (read_sp(), step_sp - 16))
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:42:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B2B843C.2090807@cygnus.com>
References: <3B2A97C7.52A839FD@cygnus.com> <3B2A9EC8.7020106@cygnus.com> <3B2AB1E7.C32AA591@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00319.html

> Well it can't be a (ugh) #ifdef :-)
> 
> 
> Not even to temporarily circumvent a known bug?


Not even to tempoarily circumvent a known bug.

> I understand your objection (multi-arch, if not general
> distaste), but there are lots of ifdefs in infrun.c already...
> 
> FYI, I was thinking along the lines of
> 	(currently_stepping (ecs)
> #ifdef TM_i386SOL2_H
> 	&& !(step_range_end
> 	    && INNER_THAN (read_sp (), (step_sp - 16)))
> #endif
> 	));
> 
> which would preserve the behavior on x86 solaris, while
> protecting the rest of the world until Peter can come up
> with a better implementation.


I honestly think it would be better to revert PeterS's N year old change 
and file a PR.

	Andrew