Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] Clean up spurious SIGSTOPS in lin-lwp
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B157C3F.A8439E2E@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105260915.f4Q9Fik00295@delius.kettenis.local>

Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
>    Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:57:39 -0700
>    From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
> 
>    Mark,
> 
>    This patch will get rid of most of those "Delayed SIGSTOP" messages,
>    so that lin_lwp_wait will rarely if ever get a SIGSTOP that was generated
>    by gdb.  It entails three basic changes:
> 
>     * In lin_lwp_attach_lwp, consume the SIGSTOP that is generated by
>       PTHREAD_ATTACH.
>     * In stop_wait_callback, try again to consume the SIGSTOP after
>       "pushing back" a SIGTRAP for a thread other than the event thread.
>     * Similarly try again to consume a SIGSTOP after tossing away a
>       redundant SIGINT.
> 
> In principle the current approach saves us a few system calls, at the
> risk of a GDB-generated SIGSTOP colliding with a SIGSTOP that wasn't
> generated by GDB.
> 
> I assume you're trying to make GDB behave a little better when some
> outside agency is generating SIGSTOPs. 

No, I'm working on a bug, and trying to simplify parts of the
event handling in order to clear the way.  The bug that I'm really
aiming for is a scheduling issue -- gdb can cause some threads
to starve.  Don't worry, it isn't your fault, it's been in all of
the linux thread debugging implementations so far.  It causes a
couple of failures in the testcase "pthreads.exp".  I know in
principal what to do, but in practice it's proving to be tricky.

I've checked in this part of the change.

Michael


      reply	other threads:[~2001-05-30 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-25 15:57 Michael Snyder
2001-05-26  2:15 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-05-30 16:03   ` Michael Snyder [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B157C3F.A8439E2E@cygnus.com \
    --to=msnyder@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@wins.uva.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox