Re: [RFA]: Remote protocol symbol lookup service.

Jonathan Larmour
2001-05-03T11:15:00Z

Michael Snyder wrote:
>
> Hmmm... I suppose so, under the right set of assumptions.
> Such as that the target is not really stopped, and we do not
> need to restart it (as with the 'O' packet).

I don't see any special treatment with the 'O' packet. If the target is
stopped, how could it have made a request?

If you do take this route, don't forget remote_async_wait().

Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine