From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, brobecker@act-europe.fr Subject: Re: patch to gdb on Tru64 5.1 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 08:32:00 -0000 Message-id: <3AF9B9D1.30405@cygnus.com> References: <20010509082227.E23184@act-europe.fr> <20010509103918.A32065@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00149.html > I just checked and I don't see any assignments with the FSF for gdb > work from ACT. This is sort of surprising since I believe that > there are two ACT representatives on the GDB steering committee. > Maybe I missed something or maybe this is another ACT. > > Anyway, IMO, you'll need an assignment with the FSF if you want to > get your change into the official gdb. This change is around > thirty lines or so and adds a new file and so I believe it does not > qualify as a trivial patch. Look at it as several, largely independant, patches (as it should have been submitted). Some(the configury ones) wouldn't need an assignment since they are obvious. The final change to alpha-nat.c, however, could be more interesting. Andrew