From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Larmour To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Remote protocol symbol lookup service. Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 11:15:00 -0000 Message-id: <3AF1A021.480ABE62@redhat.com> References: <3AF08427.3522D20E@cygnus.com> <200105031127.f43BRQV08886@localhost.localdomain> <3AF190B2.7C7AB8B8@cygnus.com> <3AF19460.5E59B957@redhat.com> <3AF199A3.886F469E@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00033.html Michael Snyder wrote: > > Hmmm... I suppose so, under the right set of assumptions. > Such as that the target is not really stopped, and we do not > need to restart it (as with the 'O' packet). I don't see any special treatment with the 'O' packet. If the target is stopped, how could it have made a request? If you do take this route, don't forget remote_async_wait(). Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine