From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Larmour To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Remote protocol symbol lookup service. Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:24:00 -0000 Message-id: <3AF19460.5E59B957@redhat.com> References: <3AF08427.3522D20E@cygnus.com> <200105031127.f43BRQV08886@localhost.localdomain> <3AF190B2.7C7AB8B8@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00031.html Michael Snyder wrote: > > Jonathan Larmour wrote: > > > > In article < 3AF090AE.4D31F3A@cygnus.com > you write: > > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > > >Michael Snyder wrote: > > >> > > >> Andrew, > > >> > > >> I've changed the initial message from "Q" to "q" as you suggested, and > > >> I've hexified the filenames and symbol names, so that they are not > > >> vulnerable to embedded special characters. If you have a name for the > > >> initial message that you would prefer over "qSharedObject", I'm open > > >> to suggestions. > > > > I still think a target should be able to request this at any point > > in the remote protocol, and not just when told of a shared object. > > Yeah? Would you be willing to implement that? ;-) Isn't it just a case of pretty much cut-and-pasting the bit that acts on a symbol request from the target into remote_wait()? Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine