From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Clean up C++ type handling in linespec parsing
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 01:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AB1DD86.42DA7AC@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200103160310.WAA26454@zwingli.cygnus.com>
OK with me. Lets ask Elena.
Elena, I know that you would like to move this to some language land,
but maybe its better get it fixed anyway.
Fernando
Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> 2001-03-15 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * linespec.c (find_methods): Just call CHECK_TYPEDEF on t, rather
> than asking for sym_class's type; that's circuitous. Remove
> sym_class, since the last use of it is gone. (This is a minor
> revision of a change from Dan Berlin.)
>
> Index: gdb/linespec.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/linespec.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -c -c -r1.6 linespec.c
> *** gdb/linespec.c 2001/03/14 18:36:45 1.6
> --- gdb/linespec.c 2001/03/16 02:06:33
> ***************
> *** 104,126 ****
> {
> int i1 = 0;
> int ibase;
> - struct symbol *sym_class;
> char *class_name = type_name_no_tag (t);
>
> /* Ignore this class if it doesn't have a name. This is ugly, but
> unless we figure out how to get the physname without the name of
> the class, then the loop can't do any good. */
> if (class_name
> ! && (sym_class = lookup_symbol (class_name,
> ! (struct block *) NULL,
> ! STRUCT_NAMESPACE,
> ! (int *) NULL,
> ! (struct symtab **) NULL)))
> {
> int method_counter;
>
> ! /* FIXME: Shouldn't this just be CHECK_TYPEDEF (t)? */
> ! t = SYMBOL_TYPE (sym_class);
>
> /* Loop over each method name. At this level, all overloads of a name
> are counted as a single name. There is an inner loop which loops over
> --- 104,122 ----
> {
> int i1 = 0;
> int ibase;
> char *class_name = type_name_no_tag (t);
>
> /* Ignore this class if it doesn't have a name. This is ugly, but
> unless we figure out how to get the physname without the name of
> the class, then the loop can't do any good. */
> if (class_name
> ! && (lookup_symbol (class_name, (struct block *) NULL,
> ! STRUCT_NAMESPACE, (int *) NULL,
> ! (struct symtab **) NULL)))
> {
> int method_counter;
>
> ! CHECK_TYPEDEF (t);
>
> /* Loop over each method name. At this level, all overloads of a name
> are counted as a single name. There is an inner loop which loops over
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-16 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-15 19:09 Jim Blandy
2001-03-16 1:36 ` Fernando Nasser [this message]
2001-03-16 6:35 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-03-20 8:21 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AB1DD86.42DA7AC@redhat.com \
--to=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=ezannoni@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox